<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I Don&#8217;t Recommend FriendFeed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://freepressblog.org/2008/07/06/i-dont-recommend-friendfeed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://freepressblog.org/2008/07/06/i-dont-recommend-friendfeed/</link>
	<description>A few thoughts and other random stuff I found interesting.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 18:15:21 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: JB</title>
		<link>http://freepressblog.org/2008/07/06/i-dont-recommend-friendfeed/comment-page-1/#comment-20607</link>
		<dc:creator>JB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 15:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freepressblog.org/?p=100376#comment-20607</guid>
		<description>If Google Reader did allow that, I guess it would be a decent *workaround* to the existing *problem*, although hopefully it would be a setting you could set on a per feed basis, since I definitely wouldn&#039;t want that behavior for most feeds.

The problem is that FriendFeed doesn&#039;t have a true comments feed. Stuffing them into the feed of the original item is interesting but not an adequate substitute.

This is not a difficult problem to understand or provide a solution for, so I&#039;m thinking that they are probably well aware of the idea, and have chosen to do things this way, in order to drive more real web traffic to their actual site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Google Reader did allow that, I guess it would be a decent *workaround* to the existing *problem*, although hopefully it would be a setting you could set on a per feed basis, since I definitely wouldn&#8217;t want that behavior for most feeds.</p>
<p>The problem is that FriendFeed doesn&#8217;t have a true comments feed. Stuffing them into the feed of the original item is interesting but not an adequate substitute.</p>
<p>This is not a difficult problem to understand or provide a solution for, so I&#8217;m thinking that they are probably well aware of the idea, and have chosen to do things this way, in order to drive more real web traffic to their actual site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Cameron</title>
		<link>http://freepressblog.org/2008/07/06/i-dont-recommend-friendfeed/comment-page-1/#comment-20606</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Cameron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 14:27:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freepressblog.org/?p=100376#comment-20606</guid>
		<description>#1: IMO it looks like it&#039;s Google Reader&#039;s fault for not telling me that the feed was updated (with new comments), probably just a feature they need to add to the UI but if you go back to the items the new comments are displayed. So the feed&#039;s being updated the UI just can&#039;t tell you.
What I&#039;ll probably do is go back and check the recent marked read posts and see if there are any new comments until Google Reader fixes how they handle updated feeds (so I know they&#039;ve been updated).

(Told you this yesterday but) most RSS clients have a feature that unmarks a read item if it&#039;s been updated, GR should do the same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#1: IMO it looks like it&#8217;s Google Reader&#8217;s fault for not telling me that the feed was updated (with new comments), probably just a feature they need to add to the UI but if you go back to the items the new comments are displayed. So the feed&#8217;s being updated the UI just can&#8217;t tell you.<br />
What I&#8217;ll probably do is go back and check the recent marked read posts and see if there are any new comments until Google Reader fixes how they handle updated feeds (so I know they&#8217;ve been updated).</p>
<p>(Told you this yesterday but) most RSS clients have a feature that unmarks a read item if it&#8217;s been updated, GR should do the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JB</title>
		<link>http://freepressblog.org/2008/07/06/i-dont-recommend-friendfeed/comment-page-1/#comment-20602</link>
		<dc:creator>JB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 06:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freepressblog.org/?p=100376#comment-20602</guid>
		<description>(On #1) Yeah, but I just don&#039;t think it should be that difficult. I&#039;ll work it out for myself, but most people aren&#039;t going to be willing and able to put in that kind of effort.

(On #2) Thanks for that link. Phase 2 of my plan for what I&#039;m doing now on this blog (pulling in all those other things) has always included pulling in comments from those other sources as well. I probably won&#039;t use that actual plugin, but it might come in handy as a reference when updating my code, if I ever get around to doing that part.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(On #1) Yeah, but I just don&#8217;t think it should be that difficult. I&#8217;ll work it out for myself, but most people aren&#8217;t going to be willing and able to put in that kind of effort.</p>
<p>(On #2) Thanks for that link. Phase 2 of my plan for what I&#8217;m doing now on this blog (pulling in all those other things) has always included pulling in comments from those other sources as well. I probably won&#8217;t use that actual plugin, but it might come in handy as a reference when updating my code, if I ever get around to doing that part.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Cameron</title>
		<link>http://freepressblog.org/2008/07/06/i-dont-recommend-friendfeed/comment-page-1/#comment-20601</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Cameron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 05:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freepressblog.org/?p=100376#comment-20601</guid>
		<description>Point one: True comment RSS feed. This does suck, a lot, but a Yahoo! Pipe or some other code can fix that with or without the ff API.

Point two: Since you&#039;re pulling all of the services that you would aggregate on ff it shouldn&#039;t matter if you used a plugin like this, http://blog.slaven.net.au/wordpress-plugins/friendfeed-comments-wordpress-plugin/
Because all the comments over there (on ff) would then be pulled into your blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Point one: True comment RSS feed. This does suck, a lot, but a Yahoo! Pipe or some other code can fix that with or without the ff API.</p>
<p>Point two: Since you&#8217;re pulling all of the services that you would aggregate on ff it shouldn&#8217;t matter if you used a plugin like this, <a href="http://blog.slaven.net.au/wordpress-plugins/friendfeed-comments-wordpress-plugin/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.slaven.net.au/wordpress-plugins/friendfeed-comments-wordpress-plugin/</a><br />
Because all the comments over there (on ff) would then be pulled into your blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
