<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another annoyance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://freepressblog.org/blog/2004/10/19/another-annoyance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://freepressblog.org/blog/2004/10/19/another-annoyance/</link>
	<description>A collection of my thoughts and other random stuff I found interesting.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:18:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: JB</title>
		<link>http://freepressblog.org/blog/2004/10/19/another-annoyance/#comment-200</link>
		<dc:creator>JB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2004 18:17:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freepressblog.org/blog/2004/10/19/another-annoyance/#comment-200</guid>
		<description>Good points; I guess it is better for them to come right out and say it than the alternative. A good example is the war coverage on TV (pick any network), where they go from pentagon press conference to administration spokesperson to paid ex-generals discussing strategy all day long, neglecting to give a voice to those with an opposing viewpoint. So much for the so-called "liberal media".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points; I guess it is better for them to come right out and say it than the alternative. A good example is the war coverage on TV (pick any network), where they go from pentagon press conference to administration spokesperson to paid ex-generals discussing strategy all day long, neglecting to give a voice to those with an opposing viewpoint. So much for the so-called &#8220;liberal media&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michel</title>
		<link>http://freepressblog.org/blog/2004/10/19/another-annoyance/#comment-199</link>
		<dc:creator>michel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2004 18:06:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freepressblog.org/blog/2004/10/19/another-annoyance/#comment-199</guid>
		<description>I think a responsible editorial ethic doesn't have to exclude endorsments. However, endorsments should never interfere with reporting. This is an entirely possible aproach to journalism, I'm not sure who's practicing it though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think a responsible editorial ethic doesn&#8217;t have to exclude endorsments. However, endorsments should never interfere with reporting. This is an entirely possible aproach to journalism, I&#8217;m not sure who&#8217;s practicing it though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nstryker</title>
		<link>http://freepressblog.org/blog/2004/10/19/another-annoyance/#comment-198</link>
		<dc:creator>nstryker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2004 16:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freepressblog.org/blog/2004/10/19/another-annoyance/#comment-198</guid>
		<description>at least by endorcing something/someone, you know what their slant is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>at least by endorcing something/someone, you know what their slant is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
