December 27, 2004 – 3:50 pm
In case you experience any issues on my blog today, I’m in the process of messing with some stuff, so that’s probably why. Please e-mail me or try back again later if something doesn’t work properly for you.
Update: OK, things should be mostly OK for now. There’s still more to do (gallery and some more style stuff, but everything should be OK functionally for now). I’ll explain more later.
December 24, 2004 – 9:11 pm
Putting Herod back into Christmas
by Joy Carroll Wallis
Read More »
December 24, 2004 – 8:59 pm
Reverse psychology in spam
Now this is amusing, a feedback item received at dslr:
Hi, I am Radhika from <removed> site. We came across your site, where there are some links to <removed> from the page Could you please remove <removed> links from your site as we donĂ¢€™t want any incoming links to our site. Kindly remove the links ASAP. Thanks & Regards Radhika G, iGlobalMedia Group Email: radhikag@iglobalmedia.com
A google search on the domain (removed from the text) provides a usenet full of their spam, comment spam all over weblogs and well, if they don’t want a link then my mother is a turkey! (sorry mom).
Obviously geared at websites with hope the owners will fall for it and write a “Haha, look at these idiots, they don’t want a link” article with, of course, a link.
Sneaky, sneaky.
December 23, 2004 – 11:01 pm
I’m sure most of you have heard this story by now, but in case you haven’t the main point is that the family of a marine that was killed in Iraq is trying to get Yahoo to give them the password to their dead son’s account, for the sake of basically getting his “last words”. They are trying several angles, but Yahoo’s position looks pretty solid.
Here’s why I support Yahoo on this:
- If the son wanted his parents to have access to the account, he could have given them the password himself. It’s not like he didn’t know he was going into a dangerous situation, so if that’s what he wanted, he should have taken care of it.
- As for e-mail communications with the family, doesn’t the family have their own copies in their own accounts? Which leads to…
- Since they would already have the email correspondence that they were a part of, the only thing they would need the password for would be to read conversations that they were not originally involved in. That just doesn’t make sense to me. How about the privacy of those other parties, who were communicating only with the son? Presumably everyone he e-mailed is still alive (and probably aware of the situation by now), and they can offer up those e-mails on their own, *if* they want to.
December 21, 2004 – 7:29 pm
This started as a comment to Dan’s post here; so read that first if you want the context of this response.
Actually, this is probably the best way for them to go. The current iTunes model won’t hold up too much longer, since even at $1 per song, people won’t continue to pay that much forever, so they have to come up with another idea.
Flat-rate subscription is the in thing right now; it’s been around for a long time in things like cable TV and internet service, and is now becoming popular with other consumer media products (video rentals specifically, with NetFlix & Blockbuster online). Read More »
December 19, 2004 – 12:09 am
Word on the street is that the next great way to get rich quick is cashing in on well timed currency trading, Euro fluctuations, etc. Given the significant amount of spam I’ve received on this subject, I’m inclined to be skeptical of this whole thing.
December 18, 2004 – 11:52 pm
In light of the especially un-funny episode of SNL tonight, check out this humorous site that my friend Randy pointed me to tonight. Especially funny are the “strong-bad e-mails”, which I had seen a while ago, but forgotten about. Check out the “radio” and “video games” sketches in particular.
December 18, 2004 – 11:36 pm
… after that opening sketch on SNL I just watched.
December 17, 2004 – 8:44 am
This is another one of those things that I hear people talk about often, but I don’t really see the point. I prefer to have everything in it’s own window, so I can cycle through them with ALT+Tab. I know there’s a similar shortcut for cycling through tabs (CTRL+Tab in Firefox), but I don’t want to have to think about whether I’m switching within the browser or between applications and use a different keyboard shortcut for each. Man, I can be picky.