<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who would have thought</title>
	<atom:link href="http://freepressblog.org/blog/2006/06/20/who-would-have-thought/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://freepressblog.org/blog/2006/06/20/who-would-have-thought/</link>
	<description>I was syncing my Facebook status here for a while, but now I'm boycotting them over the FriendConnect fiasco...</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 11:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: JB</title>
		<link>http://freepressblog.org/blog/2006/06/20/who-would-have-thought/#comment-4788</link>
		<dc:creator>JB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 16:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freepressblog.org/blog/2006/06/20/who-would-have-thought/#comment-4788</guid>
		<description>I guess you'd need to know more about the military to know that they aren't usually interested in giving a platform to people who vocally oppose their actions and/or policies. I suppose that whether that tendency is extended into West Point is a separate issue, and that is as it should be, so kudos to them (as I was trying to say in the original post, and not even as a backhanded compliment).

Don't get too distracted by my surprise, though; that was a side point of the post. Write it off as my own bias if it makes you feel better, but don't let that stop you from watching the clip, because it's quite good, and it's only five minutes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess you&#8217;d need to know more about the military to know that they aren&#8217;t usually interested in giving a platform to people who vocally oppose their actions and/or policies. I suppose that whether that tendency is extended into West Point is a separate issue, and that is as it should be, so kudos to them (as I was trying to say in the original post, and not even as a backhanded compliment).</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t get too distracted by my surprise, though; that was a side point of the post. Write it off as my own bias if it makes you feel better, but don&#8217;t let that stop you from watching the clip, because it&#8217;s quite good, and it&#8217;s only five minutes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nstryker</title>
		<link>http://freepressblog.org/blog/2006/06/20/who-would-have-thought/#comment-4789</link>
		<dc:creator>nstryker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 15:57:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freepressblog.org/blog/2006/06/20/who-would-have-thought/#comment-4789</guid>
		<description>the clip is excellent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the clip is excellent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate</title>
		<link>http://freepressblog.org/blog/2006/06/20/who-would-have-thought/#comment-4787</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 13:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freepressblog.org/blog/2006/06/20/who-would-have-thought/#comment-4787</guid>
		<description>Don't have time to watch, but don't understand why you think this is surprising.  I Can't see why West Point wouldn't be like any other top tier university filled with smart, curious students eager to listen and converse with a popular intellectual. I'm sure nobody at West Point is afraid of his analysis, regardless of how broken they think it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t have time to watch, but don&#8217;t understand why you think this is surprising.  I Can&#8217;t see why West Point wouldn&#8217;t be like any other top tier university filled with smart, curious students eager to listen and converse with a popular intellectual. I&#8217;m sure nobody at West Point is afraid of his analysis, regardless of how broken they think it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
