Monthly Archives: July 2006

I just sent an internet

Boy are we in trouble when we’ve got people like Senator Ted Stevens involved in making decisions about technology policy, as evidenced in his brief yet revealing mini-speech on how the internet works, while explaining his opposition to net neutrality.

The page also contains audio, which is even funnier to listen to because you get to hear him bumbling his way through it and get a real sense of just how little he really understands about this. (Almost thought it was Bush when I heard the first few phrases - different voice, same confused presentation style)

Here are some notable highlights:

I just the other day got, an internet was sent by my staff at 10 o’clock in the morning on Friday and I just got it yesterday. Why?

Because it got tangled up with all these things going on the internet commercially.

This one is particularly funny since net neutrality is designed to limit the commercial interests from being able to use a disproportionate share of bandwidth. I’m guessing he got chewed out pretty good by his employers lobbyists after that comment.

They want to deliver vast amounts of information over the internet. And again, the internet is not something you just dump something on. It’s not a truck. It’s a series of tubes.

Now I think these people are arguing whether they should be able to dump all that stuff on the internet ought to consider if they should develop a system themselves. Maybe there is a place for a commercial net but it’s not using what consumers use every day.

I’m not sure what’s funnier - his lack of understanding of the technical details, or his attempts to regurgitate what his sponsors have told him in a way that is essentially the exact opposite of what those sponsors are trying to accomplish.

Ironically, in my mind this kind of thing is really the main point against net neutrality legislation, so I guess in a round about way he’s doing what he set out to do. I do agree that it is very troubling to consider that a bunch of guys like this would be crafting a law related to technology like the internet.

What I’d love to see is a pre-voting requirement test, which all the legislators would have to pass and demonstrate an actual understanding of how things like this work before they are allowed to vote on them.

Switch (to Linux that is)

After our recent conversation about one of the aspects I don’t like about Apple over on Dan’s blog, I just happened to listen to a recent episode of the Geek Nights podcast on which they discuss their recent (but short lived) switch to a Mac (and Garage Band) for their podcasting duties.

These guys do multiple shows per week, and until this point had been using Audacity and Rezound with Linux. They had heard so many good things about how podcasting (and audio recording in general) is so much better on the Mac that they bought one, and that episode is a recounting of some of their experiences. To be honest (even though I give Apple a hard time a lot) I never suspected that there were so many big problems, of the nature that they ran into. I’d urge you to listen to the show, and (especially if you’re a Mac person, you know who you guys are), comment here and tell me if anything was wrong, or if they were just missing something on some issues, etc.

After hearing this, I was prompted to do some searching, and found a couple very recent entries from pretty knowledgeable people who (until now) were die-hard Mac advocates (Cory Doctorow and Mark Pilgrim) explaining on their blogs why they are making the move away from Apple and to Linux.

At least this gives me comfort in knowing that my anti-Apple tendencies do not make me crazy… :)

Blue Frog: lessons learned

(or not, as the case may be — see the end of this article)

This is kind of an old story, but I just heard a discussion about a recent development in it, and remembered I hadn’t talked about it before on this blog.

Some of you may remember a product that was being talked about a while ago called “Blue Frog”, which was an attempt at fighting spam by turning the tables on the spammers. The basic idea was that you sign up with Blue Frog and then flag your spam mail, and Blue Frog will send massive amounts of unsubscribe messages back to the spammer’s address “on your behalf”. It was basically an attempted DOS (denial of service) against the spammers, with a loophole that technically made it legal.

I always thought that this was a stupid idea, for a number of reasons, and there was a major incident a couple months ago in which a guy going by the name of “PharmaMaster” illustrated one of the primary follies in Blue Frog’s approach by launching a retaliatory DDOS (distributed denial of service) against Blue Frog and eventually their hosting providers, etc. which ended up taking them down, even after a number of attempts were made to thwart and/or avoid the attacks. They should have known that they would never be able to beat these people by using their own means against them.

Read More »

Good parody

of those funny but not logically sound Mac ads with the nerd guy and the young guy:

This one’s for Dan

Note to self:

Bring stuff to fix computers with you wherever you go.

I was at a friends house tonight, and they had a computer that appears to have been infected with something, or had something else going on, but I couldn’t really do a proper diagnostic, since I didn’t have all the necessary tools. I think I will have to keep a directory on my USB drive with the essentials, and maybe also have some spare live CDs for scanning and diagnostics in the car as well.

Shower door

I put in a shower door today in our bathroom, since it had been missing one since our earlier gutting of that bathroom. I unfortunately was looking at the wrong box label / brochure type thing in the store, because I thought the one we were getting was the adjustable width one, but when I got it home and unpacked it I realized it was the kind where you have to cut all the metal pieces to the appropriate widths yourself with a hacksaw, which is definitely a pain.