Comments on: Microsoft speculation http://freepressblog.org/blog/2006/08/24/microsoft-speculation/ A collection of my thoughts and other random stuff I found interesting. Fri, 21 Nov 2008 18:53:32 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3 By: JaredB http://freepressblog.org/blog/2006/08/24/microsoft-speculation/#comment-5225 JaredB Fri, 01 Sep 2006 00:58:56 +0000 http://freepressblog.org/blog/2006/08/24/microsoft-speculation/#comment-5225 And here I was trying not to give away any details... And here I was trying not to give away any details…

]]> By: Dave Z http://freepressblog.org/blog/2006/08/24/microsoft-speculation/#comment-5224 Dave Z Thu, 31 Aug 2006 16:20:33 +0000 http://freepressblog.org/blog/2006/08/24/microsoft-speculation/#comment-5224 The MPAA picture is not that good, I plan to have a great camera with the next cell obtained. The MPAA picture is not that good, I plan to have a great camera with the next cell obtained.

]]> By: Dave Z http://freepressblog.org/blog/2006/08/24/microsoft-speculation/#comment-5223 Dave Z Thu, 31 Aug 2006 16:16:45 +0000 http://freepressblog.org/blog/2006/08/24/microsoft-speculation/#comment-5223 Oh yes that, we had a chance to go back into that office this tuesday and passed. The transport of Avid output over IP is not up to the quality they need. IF they wanted it as is, the plan was one system on the island and 1 in JJ's ( look at the credits ) home and others. That would have been interesting to go to. Could still be a go this fall. Oh yes that, we had a chance to go back into that office this tuesday and passed. The transport of Avid output over IP is not up to the quality they need. IF they wanted it as is, the plan was one system on the island and 1 in JJ’s ( look at the credits ) home and others. That would have been interesting to go to. Could still be a go this fall.

]]> By: JB http://freepressblog.org/blog/2006/08/24/microsoft-speculation/#comment-5221 JB Wed, 30 Aug 2006 03:18:21 +0000 http://freepressblog.org/blog/2006/08/24/microsoft-speculation/#comment-5221 Looks like I did get it, thanks. I'm always up for more of that certain kind of info you were giving us the other day though (which I won't detail on here). Looks like I did get it, thanks.

I’m always up for more of that certain kind of info you were giving us the other day though (which I won’t detail on here).

]]> By: Dave Z http://freepressblog.org/blog/2006/08/24/microsoft-speculation/#comment-5222 Dave Z Tue, 29 Aug 2006 21:03:15 +0000 http://freepressblog.org/blog/2006/08/24/microsoft-speculation/#comment-5222 Yes, to your address from our church that you gave me awhile ago. Yes, to your address from our church that you gave me awhile ago.

]]> By: JB http://freepressblog.org/blog/2006/08/24/microsoft-speculation/#comment-5217 JB Tue, 29 Aug 2006 06:10:32 +0000 http://freepressblog.org/blog/2006/08/24/microsoft-speculation/#comment-5217 Did you send it via e-mail? I'm still pretty backed up as far as that goes... Did you send it via e-mail? I’m still pretty backed up as far as that goes…

]]> By: Dave Z http://freepressblog.org/blog/2006/08/24/microsoft-speculation/#comment-5219 Dave Z Mon, 28 Aug 2006 17:08:09 +0000 http://freepressblog.org/blog/2006/08/24/microsoft-speculation/#comment-5219 Did you ever get that MPAA picture? Did you ever get that MPAA picture?

]]> By: Dave Z http://freepressblog.org/blog/2006/08/24/microsoft-speculation/#comment-5218 Dave Z Mon, 28 Aug 2006 17:07:14 +0000 http://freepressblog.org/blog/2006/08/24/microsoft-speculation/#comment-5218 We are currently getting 400p at rates as low as 128K. Videoconferencing today on 80's tvs looks bad. High Def is just coming in the biz video market but needs more bandwidth for a multisite call than most businesses can allocate. So it is more of a marketing buzzword than actuallity. We are currently getting 400p at rates as low as 128K. Videoconferencing today on 80’s tvs looks bad.
High Def is just coming in the biz video market but needs more bandwidth for a multisite call than most businesses can allocate. So it is more of a marketing buzzword than actuallity.

]]> By: JB http://freepressblog.org/blog/2006/08/24/microsoft-speculation/#comment-5220 JB Fri, 25 Aug 2006 03:43:34 +0000 http://freepressblog.org/blog/2006/08/24/microsoft-speculation/#comment-5220 I don't think they should let resolution hold them back, though; most people will be happy with what they can get out of their current equipment, unless they have such insane amounts of bandwidth that they want higher definition video. I don’t think they should let resolution hold them back, though; most people will be happy with what they can get out of their current equipment, unless they have such insane amounts of bandwidth that they want higher definition video.

]]> By: Dave Z http://freepressblog.org/blog/2006/08/24/microsoft-speculation/#comment-5216 Dave Z Thu, 24 Aug 2006 22:42:58 +0000 http://freepressblog.org/blog/2006/08/24/microsoft-speculation/#comment-5216 They do state they will use an internet connection. The bandwidth in Tv is above ethernet. I think it is in the 3-5 meg range, so there should be enough bandwidth for videoconferencing. One smart thing is that they will use the home tv. Up to recently the standard home tv didn't have the resolution required. They do state they will use an internet connection.
The bandwidth in Tv is above ethernet. I think it is in the 3-5 meg range, so there should be enough bandwidth for videoconferencing.
One smart thing is that they will use the home tv. Up to recently the standard home tv didn’t have the resolution required.

]]>