<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Still feeling secure?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://freepressblog.org/blog/2006/10/12/still-feeling-secure/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://freepressblog.org/blog/2006/10/12/still-feeling-secure/</link>
	<description>I was syncing my Facebook status here for a while, but now I'm boycotting them over the FriendConnect fiasco...</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 13:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: JB</title>
		<link>http://freepressblog.org/blog/2006/10/12/still-feeling-secure/#comment-5429</link>
		<dc:creator>JB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 23:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freepressblog.org/blog/2006/10/12/still-feeling-secure/#comment-5429</guid>
		<description>So it's OK to treat people poorly, including locking them up without charge or trial and torturing them, as long as they aren't wearing uniforms? I don't think so. But you point to another  huge difference in this so-called "war" - the "enemy combatants" aren't necessarily armed or "combating" anything, it's just whoever we just to throw that label on, they can be carted away and never heard from or given a chance to refute the charges.

It's pointless to argue about the torture issue. If the photographic evidence and numerous eyewitness accounts and secret detention facilities in countries which allow torture aren't enough to convince you, then perhaps the fact that the administration actively opposes every single bill that would in any way restrict activities of interrogators, even brutal methods.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So it&#8217;s OK to treat people poorly, including locking them up without charge or trial and torturing them, as long as they aren&#8217;t wearing uniforms? I don&#8217;t think so. But you point to another  huge difference in this so-called &#8220;war&#8221; - the &#8220;enemy combatants&#8221; aren&#8217;t necessarily armed or &#8220;combating&#8221; anything, it&#8217;s just whoever we just to throw that label on, they can be carted away and never heard from or given a chance to refute the charges.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s pointless to argue about the torture issue. If the photographic evidence and numerous eyewitness accounts and secret detention facilities in countries which allow torture aren&#8217;t enough to convince you, then perhaps the fact that the administration actively opposes every single bill that would in any way restrict activities of interrogators, even brutal methods.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Z</title>
		<link>http://freepressblog.org/blog/2006/10/12/still-feeling-secure/#comment-5428</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 22:38:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freepressblog.org/blog/2006/10/12/still-feeling-secure/#comment-5428</guid>
		<description>Non - US Citizens don't legally have US Citizen  rights, which is the same in most countries.

Not justifing it or allowing it-"the suspension of certain rights in time of war", just reporting it as a cause.

If this was a normal war with countries adhering to standards put in place by the geneva convention where soldiers wear uniforms and other combatants who don't are killed immediately as spys or sabotaurs, the civil
liberties would be clearly outlined as to what is and what isn't going to be allowed.
Since, combatants who are killing are disgused as civilians and target civilians that would argue for a review of our current rules of war and engagement, IMHO.

torture? - that drum has been overplayed and zero evidence has come out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Non - US Citizens don&#8217;t legally have US Citizen  rights, which is the same in most countries.</p>
<p>Not justifing it or allowing it-&#8221;the suspension of certain rights in time of war&#8221;, just reporting it as a cause.</p>
<p>If this was a normal war with countries adhering to standards put in place by the geneva convention where soldiers wear uniforms and other combatants who don&#8217;t are killed immediately as spys or sabotaurs, the civil<br />
liberties would be clearly outlined as to what is and what isn&#8217;t going to be allowed.<br />
Since, combatants who are killing are disgused as civilians and target civilians that would argue for a review of our current rules of war and engagement, IMHO.</p>
<p>torture? - that drum has been overplayed and zero evidence has come out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JB</title>
		<link>http://freepressblog.org/blog/2006/10/12/still-feeling-secure/#comment-5443</link>
		<dc:creator>JB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 17:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freepressblog.org/blog/2006/10/12/still-feeling-secure/#comment-5443</guid>
		<description>But there are significant problems with that justification.

(1) The rights of everyone are being infringed, not JUST terrorists. It would be nice if they wore labels so you could tell who's who, but that isn't going to happen. Also, I think that most rights that we enjoy in this country should be considered human rights, not American rights. "All men (not just all americans) were created equal, and endowed with certain inalienable rights..." When people are thrown in prison without trial or even a formal charge (meaning that they have not been proven to be "terrorists"), and kept there for years and sometimes tortured, I think it's an outrage whether they're american citizens or not. Many of the "evil" regimes that we oppose do the same thing (lock up people whenever they feel like it, without proving they've done anything wrong) and we speak out against it; I say we should hold ourselves to the same standards.

(2) The huge problem with allowing for the suspension of civil liberties in a "time of war", &lt;strong&gt;especially&lt;/strong&gt; in this case, is that we aren't in a traditional war. We could debate whether it would be OK even if we were, but it's irrelevant because the "war on terror" (much like the "war on drugs") will &lt;strong&gt;never&lt;/strong&gt; be over, so I'm most definitely not OK with accepting those limitations during "wartime".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But there are significant problems with that justification.</p>
<p>(1) The rights of everyone are being infringed, not JUST terrorists. It would be nice if they wore labels so you could tell who&#8217;s who, but that isn&#8217;t going to happen. Also, I think that most rights that we enjoy in this country should be considered human rights, not American rights. &#8220;All men (not just all americans) were created equal, and endowed with certain inalienable rights&#8230;&#8221; When people are thrown in prison without trial or even a formal charge (meaning that they have not been proven to be &#8220;terrorists&#8221;), and kept there for years and sometimes tortured, I think it&#8217;s an outrage whether they&#8217;re american citizens or not. Many of the &#8220;evil&#8221; regimes that we oppose do the same thing (lock up people whenever they feel like it, without proving they&#8217;ve done anything wrong) and we speak out against it; I say we should hold ourselves to the same standards.</p>
<p>(2) The huge problem with allowing for the suspension of civil liberties in a &#8220;time of war&#8221;, <strong>especially</strong> in this case, is that we aren&#8217;t in a traditional war. We could debate whether it would be OK even if we were, but it&#8217;s irrelevant because the &#8220;war on terror&#8221; (much like the &#8220;war on drugs&#8221;) will <strong>never</strong> be over, so I&#8217;m most definitely not OK with accepting those limitations during &#8220;wartime&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Z</title>
		<link>http://freepressblog.org/blog/2006/10/12/still-feeling-secure/#comment-5442</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 15:09:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freepressblog.org/blog/2006/10/12/still-feeling-secure/#comment-5442</guid>
		<description>Good, if you did feel controlled then that would suck.

I do feel manipulated at times by both political parties and media and try to fight it by not buying what the mainstream NY, LA Times self proclaimed " intelligencia "  BS network news is selling.

Haven't heard about the "unpatriotic/terrorists sympathizer " pitch.

Groups and people are plotting ways to kill innocent Americans on our soil. I hope the government is doing something about it.
I have few rights in Mexico, foreign agents who are here in the US with the sole purpose of  terror have zero rights in my opinion.

I think the US government has had a long history of circumventing some laws that are there for peaceful times, because they look at as if we are at war, with certain groups( not advocating it just talking about it, i.e. Clinton and the Branch Davidians )and the rules and liberties are different in wartime.
This has been going on since at least WWII.

Keyspan is the power supplier for LI.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good, if you did feel controlled then that would suck.</p>
<p>I do feel manipulated at times by both political parties and media and try to fight it by not buying what the mainstream NY, LA Times self proclaimed &#8221; intelligencia &#8221;  BS network news is selling.</p>
<p>Haven&#8217;t heard about the &#8220;unpatriotic/terrorists sympathizer &#8221; pitch.</p>
<p>Groups and people are plotting ways to kill innocent Americans on our soil. I hope the government is doing something about it.<br />
I have few rights in Mexico, foreign agents who are here in the US with the sole purpose of  terror have zero rights in my opinion.</p>
<p>I think the US government has had a long history of circumventing some laws that are there for peaceful times, because they look at as if we are at war, with certain groups( not advocating it just talking about it, i.e. Clinton and the Branch Davidians )and the rules and liberties are different in wartime.<br />
This has been going on since at least WWII.</p>
<p>Keyspan is the power supplier for LI.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JB</title>
		<link>http://freepressblog.org/blog/2006/10/12/still-feeling-secure/#comment-5430</link>
		<dc:creator>JB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 05:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freepressblog.org/blog/2006/10/12/still-feeling-secure/#comment-5430</guid>
		<description>I'm not suggesting this incident wasn't an accident at all.

I don't feel controlled by the government, because I don't buy into that load of crap they're trying to sell us, telling us they need to "control" us more by restricting our civil liberties in the name of security. Unfortunately a lot of people still are buying it, and calling those that don't "unpatriotic", "terrorist sympathizers", etc.

I don't know anything about Keyspan, so I haven't commented about them at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not suggesting this incident wasn&#8217;t an accident at all.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t feel controlled by the government, because I don&#8217;t buy into that load of crap they&#8217;re trying to sell us, telling us they need to &#8220;control&#8221; us more by restricting our civil liberties in the name of security. Unfortunately a lot of people still are buying it, and calling those that don&#8217;t &#8220;unpatriotic&#8221;, &#8220;terrorist sympathizers&#8221;, etc.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know anything about Keyspan, so I haven&#8217;t commented about them at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Z</title>
		<link>http://freepressblog.org/blog/2006/10/12/still-feeling-secure/#comment-5439</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 22:03:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freepressblog.org/blog/2006/10/12/still-feeling-secure/#comment-5439</guid>
		<description>This particular incident was an accident.

Control ??? Do you feel controlled by the gov.?

And Keyspan power of NY is hardly a conservative org. they support the liberal causes on LI.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This particular incident was an accident.</p>
<p>Control ??? Do you feel controlled by the gov.?</p>
<p>And Keyspan power of NY is hardly a conservative org. they support the liberal causes on LI.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JB</title>
		<link>http://freepressblog.org/blog/2006/10/12/still-feeling-secure/#comment-5426</link>
		<dc:creator>JB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 20:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freepressblog.org/blog/2006/10/12/still-feeling-secure/#comment-5426</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I think the government does "know something"; they know that it's easy to control people who are living in fear by offering them safety, whether it's real safety or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I think the government does &#8220;know something&#8221;; they know that it&#8217;s easy to control people who are living in fear by offering them safety, whether it&#8217;s real safety or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Z</title>
		<link>http://freepressblog.org/blog/2006/10/12/still-feeling-secure/#comment-5425</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 15:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freepressblog.org/blog/2006/10/12/still-feeling-secure/#comment-5425</guid>
		<description>My comment count lead over the remainder of the comment list is worthy to maintain. I used to be ranked above nathan.

Liberty is a fluid dynamic concept in any society.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My comment count lead over the remainder of the comment list is worthy to maintain. I used to be ranked above nathan.</p>
<p>Liberty is a fluid dynamic concept in any society.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Z</title>
		<link>http://freepressblog.org/blog/2006/10/12/still-feeling-secure/#comment-5427</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 15:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freepressblog.org/blog/2006/10/12/still-feeling-secure/#comment-5427</guid>
		<description>JB, thanks.
I am concerned about my comment count.

Pro civil liberties for everyone except certain people groups that the recent terrorists are a part of. :-) jk.

Friends in NY don't feel safe. 9 11 is very fresh on their minds. Some NYers will riot and many arab people will be targeted in the city if there is a 2nd attack in that area.
Many rioted during a power blackout, some died. The police couldn't handle it and it was bad.

One friend said that everywhere you look companies are pushing 3 day home and office disaster kits. The power company keyspan was promoting the "get ready for a disaster" kits and supplies. My friend's son asked if "they ( government )" knew something and was getting everyone ready.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JB, thanks.<br />
I am concerned about my comment count.</p>
<p>Pro civil liberties for everyone except certain people groups that the recent terrorists are a part of. <img src='http://freepressblog.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> jk.</p>
<p>Friends in NY don&#8217;t feel safe. 9 11 is very fresh on their minds. Some NYers will riot and many arab people will be targeted in the city if there is a 2nd attack in that area.<br />
Many rioted during a power blackout, some died. The police couldn&#8217;t handle it and it was bad.</p>
<p>One friend said that everywhere you look companies are pushing 3 day home and office disaster kits. The power company keyspan was promoting the &#8220;get ready for a disaster&#8221; kits and supplies. My friend&#8217;s son asked if &#8220;they ( government )&#8221; knew something and was getting everyone ready.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nstryker</title>
		<link>http://freepressblog.org/blog/2006/10/12/still-feeling-secure/#comment-5441</link>
		<dc:creator>nstryker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 17:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freepressblog.org/blog/2006/10/12/still-feeling-secure/#comment-5441</guid>
		<description>i think you're missing the government's reason for all this security.  they just don't want &lt;em&gt;arabs&lt;/em&gt; flying planes into buildings, just like the communists before, and the japanese before that, etc.  i have confindence that our government will always protect the rights of the rich and famous to destroy themselves as well as public and private property.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think you&#8217;re missing the government&#8217;s reason for all this security.  they just don&#8217;t want <em>arabs</em> flying planes into buildings, just like the communists before, and the japanese before that, etc.  i have confindence that our government will always protect the rights of the rich and famous to destroy themselves as well as public and private property.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
