December 28, 2006 – 5:14 pm
You’ve probably heard about Microsoft giving away laptops preloaded with Vista to select bloggers, with the hope (but not requirement) that they will review them. You’ve also probably heard all the backlash, up to and including many other bloggers accusing anyone who accepts the free laptops as basically losing any credibility / journalistic integrity.
I thought I’d briefly offer my take on the whole thing, and see what everyone else thinks. Basically, I think it’s a pretty wise move to motivate more talk about Vista from a lot of people who would probably otherwise not buy it. As for the implication that anyone accepting a free laptop is no longer a credible source for tech reporting, I don’t quite buy it.
Will they write a review they otherwise probably wouldn’t have? Most likely. Will that opinion and review be influenced by the fact that they received a free laptop? Depends on the integrity of the writer, not the fact that they were given a gift. There are no pre-conditions imposed on the acceptance of the laptops; they can write negative reviews or not write a review at all if they choose.
The error in logic I see with the accusation that those bloggers who accept the gift should no longer be considered honest, unbiased sources is that the gift does not make them unethical in and of itself. If you believe that the opinions of the author of the blog really are subject to this kind of bribery, then it makes no difference whether they accept the gift or not, because you’ve already decided you don’t trust their integrity, because you believe that they would allow that to influence their opinion or review. If that is the case, you have no way of knowing what other gifts/bribes they have been given that they haven’t disclosed, so you may as well stop reading them whether they accept the laptops or not, because you’ve already determined that they don’t have integrity. If, on the other hand, you believe (and think it’s important) that they do currently adhere to a high standard of honesty in their writings, then why would they not continue to do so going forward?
Basically, my take on the bashing of this so far is that it’s mostly a bunch of sour grapes from bloggers who either didn’t get the offer or are so biased themselves already against Microsoft that they will always criticize pretty much everything they do regardless of whether it’s actually “good”, “evil”, or neutral.
December 27, 2006 – 11:25 am
Has anyone else tried FlickrBackup yet?
It pretty much does what its name implies, goes onto your Flickr account and downloads all the photos you select, for backup purposes.
What I’d really like to see is an option for backing up all the meta data as well (comments, descriptions, etc.). That’s the only thing that I don’t like about these kinds of services - getting your data “locked in” to their site. As of now, they don’t give you an option for exporting the meta data easily, but thankfully (from a brief glance at the API), it looks like this is possible, so maybe someone will do this eventually in an application like this.
December 26, 2006 – 8:48 pm
In case you hadn’t noticed, I updated my top commenters plugin to no include a link pulled from the “URL” field that was submitted with the comments.
The back story is that for a while now it was pulling a random URL, and the problem with that was for some people (specifically Dan) it was often getting an old URL. Initially, I thought about changing it to always get the URL from the most recent comment submitted by that person, but there were several issues with that approach, that I can go into in more detail if you’re wondering about them.
So, instead I decided to have the plugin check if there is a registered user with that name (by the “display name” property in their profile), and pull the URL in from their profile instead, which they can manage and change themselves at any time.
The one drawback to this approach is that most of the people (other than Dan, Nathan and Nate) haven’t registered. I could go in and create dummy accounts for those of you who don’t want to, and I probably eventually will (at least for those I have e-mail addresses for, so that you can reset your password later), but who knows when I’ll get around to that, so if you’re really itching to get your link back in that list, go ahead and register using the link in the sidebar below, or here.
December 25, 2006 – 11:34 pm
If you’re a tech nerd, you’ve probably heard of the latest “atrocity” Google has committed by now. I say that in a joking tone of course, although I do think it’s a valid ding in their credibility.
In case you’re not familiar with the basics of the story, Google has been pimping out it’s own services at the top of search results that appear to be related to one of their products. I first saw it from WordPress developer Matt, talking about promoting Blogger in blog-related searches, but apparently they’re applying similar tactics to promote their calendar and photo sharing services as well. Firefox developer Blake Ross has a great article on this issue with lots more details and insight.
I’m curious what everyone else thinks about this. Is it bad, and if so how bad and why? Discuss…
December 24, 2006 – 2:35 pm
Just take a moment to remember:
Do not store up for yourselves treasures on earth, where moth and rust destroy, and where thieves break in and steal. But store up for yourselves treasures in heaven, where moth and rust do not destroy, and where thieves do not break in and steal. For where your treasure is, there your heart will be also. - Matthew 6:19-21
or, as Moby says:
christ compels us to recognize that the material world and all of our possessions will ultimately turn into dust, so we shouldn’t get too attached to our bodies, our lives, and our stuff.
- Thanks to Jason for the link
December 24, 2006 – 1:54 am
Well, I finally got around to watching the first 11 episodes of the show Heroes this week, just in time for it to start back up again next month.
Now I don’t have to tell everyone to be quiet when they talk about it in order to avoid spoilers.
Of course, I really like it so far. It’s a very “comic book” style story, in many ways, which isn’t surprising considering the involvement of people like Jeph Loeb and Tim Sale in the creative process.
One of those ways that I wasn’t expecting (because of the frequent comparisons to Lost) is the slightly more spoon-fed style in which they dish out what’s happening in the plot. I’m not saying that’s a bad thing in any way, but I was just expecting more of a mysterious aspect because of the Lost talk.