<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Man vs. Wild - Is it fake?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://freepressblog.org/blog/2007/07/31/man-vs-wild-is-it-fake/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://freepressblog.org/blog/2007/07/31/man-vs-wild-is-it-fake/</link>
	<description>A collection of my thoughts and other random stuff I found interesting.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 08:04:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: CWG</title>
		<link>http://freepressblog.org/blog/2007/07/31/man-vs-wild-is-it-fake/#comment-9549</link>
		<dc:creator>CWG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 14:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freepressblog.org/blog/2007/07/31/man-vs-wild-is-it-fake/#comment-9549</guid>
		<description>Who cares if it's fake, most television is anyways. It's entertainment, and to tell you the truth if I'm ever stranded, I'm sure some of Bear's tips would come in handy. I wish everyone would quit making such a big deal out of this. It's not like he murdered someone. Furthermore, the dude was in the British Special Forces, he summited Everest at 23(after he broke his back), and he sailed the artic ocean, the guy is plain and simple a badass, so we should just leave him alone. The great thing about tv is you aren't simply limited to one channel, so if you have a problem with man vs wild, change the F@*$ing channel.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who cares if it&#8217;s fake, most television is anyways. It&#8217;s entertainment, and to tell you the truth if I&#8217;m ever stranded, I&#8217;m sure some of Bear&#8217;s tips would come in handy. I wish everyone would quit making such a big deal out of this. It&#8217;s not like he murdered someone. Furthermore, the dude was in the British Special Forces, he summited Everest at 23(after he broke his back), and he sailed the artic ocean, the guy is plain and simple a badass, so we should just leave him alone. The great thing about tv is you aren&#8217;t simply limited to one channel, so if you have a problem with man vs wild, change the F@*$ing channel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JB</title>
		<link>http://freepressblog.org/blog/2007/07/31/man-vs-wild-is-it-fake/#comment-8109</link>
		<dc:creator>JB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 21:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freepressblog.org/blog/2007/07/31/man-vs-wild-is-it-fake/#comment-8109</guid>
		<description>I agree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nstryker</title>
		<link>http://freepressblog.org/blog/2007/07/31/man-vs-wild-is-it-fake/#comment-8107</link>
		<dc:creator>nstryker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 20:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freepressblog.org/blog/2007/07/31/man-vs-wild-is-it-fake/#comment-8107</guid>
		<description>i think the problem is that the discovery channel has two very similar shows with different rules.  in survivor man, he starts off the show with a limited number of supplies and is utterly alone.  he handles all the cameras himself and must survive seven days.

man vs. wild is more like a show giving context to survival tips.  he's there with a camera crew and often does unnecessary things simply to demonstrate how they're done.  once he made a fire without the use of his flint.  another time he did not eat a snake even though it was the only food he found because it was endangered (he said if it was life and death, you should eat it).

there's no promise of authenticity in man vs. wild, so i don't understand what the big deal is.  even survivor man chooses what items he takes with him to match the conditions...it's television!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think the problem is that the discovery channel has two very similar shows with different rules.  in survivor man, he starts off the show with a limited number of supplies and is utterly alone.  he handles all the cameras himself and must survive seven days.</p>
<p>man vs. wild is more like a show giving context to survival tips.  he&#8217;s there with a camera crew and often does unnecessary things simply to demonstrate how they&#8217;re done.  once he made a fire without the use of his flint.  another time he did not eat a snake even though it was the only food he found because it was endangered (he said if it was life and death, you should eat it).</p>
<p>there&#8217;s no promise of authenticity in man vs. wild, so i don&#8217;t understand what the big deal is.  even survivor man chooses what items he takes with him to match the conditions&#8230;it&#8217;s television!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JB</title>
		<link>http://freepressblog.org/blog/2007/07/31/man-vs-wild-is-it-fake/#comment-8103</link>
		<dc:creator>JB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 19:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freepressblog.org/blog/2007/07/31/man-vs-wild-is-it-fake/#comment-8103</guid>
		<description>That NY Post article was basically just a rehash of the same stuff from the same source (Mark Weinert) in the BBC article. The only new info that wasn't in the first one was that the show does plan to do more disclosure in the context of the episodes about the exact nature of any additional assistance &lt;em&gt;may have&lt;/em&gt; he received. They don't confirm the specific allegations mentioned by Weinert in any detail.

As for it being as plotted out and prepared as you suspect, I don't think there is necessarily anything that suggests that. I'm not saying it's not possible, just that there's no evidence to indicate either way. Don't get me wrong, I'm skeptical about most things too, but in this case (where it doesn't really matter much either way), I'll give them the benefit of the doubt until something indicates otherwise.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That NY Post article was basically just a rehash of the same stuff from the same source (Mark Weinert) in the BBC article. The only new info that wasn&#8217;t in the first one was that the show does plan to do more disclosure in the context of the episodes about the exact nature of any additional assistance <em>may have</em> he received. They don&#8217;t confirm the specific allegations mentioned by Weinert in any detail.</p>
<p>As for it being as plotted out and prepared as you suspect, I don&#8217;t think there is necessarily anything that suggests that. I&#8217;m not saying it&#8217;s not possible, just that there&#8217;s no evidence to indicate either way. Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I&#8217;m skeptical about most things too, but in this case (where it doesn&#8217;t really matter much either way), I&#8217;ll give them the benefit of the doubt until something indicates otherwise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://freepressblog.org/blog/2007/07/31/man-vs-wild-is-it-fake/#comment-8102</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 19:41:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freepressblog.org/blog/2007/07/31/man-vs-wild-is-it-fake/#comment-8102</guid>
		<description>Since pownce links don't come through you missed &lt;a href="http://www.nypost.com/seven/07242007/news/nationalnews/grylls_thrills_bogus__expert_nationalnews_don_kaplan.htm" rel="nofollow"&gt;this article from the NYT&lt;/a&gt; and the show pretty much admits wrong doing by going back to edit previous episodes to disclose more to the viewer as well as doing the same in all future episodes.

From watching it I think the show is cool but I think the entire show is plotted out including what he's going to eat and where he's going to stay and what he's going to jump off of and items he uses in the show are most likely propped, like the wire he used for the compass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since pownce links don&#8217;t come through you missed <a href="http://www.nypost.com/seven/07242007/news/nationalnews/grylls_thrills_bogus__expert_nationalnews_don_kaplan.htm" rel="nofollow">this article from the NYT</a> and the show pretty much admits wrong doing by going back to edit previous episodes to disclose more to the viewer as well as doing the same in all future episodes.</p>
<p>From watching it I think the show is cool but I think the entire show is plotted out including what he&#8217;s going to eat and where he&#8217;s going to stay and what he&#8217;s going to jump off of and items he uses in the show are most likely propped, like the wire he used for the compass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
