<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blog hosting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://freepressblog.org/blog/2007/12/13/blog-hosting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://freepressblog.org/blog/2007/12/13/blog-hosting/</link>
	<description>I was syncing my Facebook status here for a while, but now I'm boycotting them over the FriendConnect fiasco...</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 17:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: JB</title>
		<link>http://freepressblog.org/blog/2007/12/13/blog-hosting/#comment-16822</link>
		<dc:creator>JB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 05:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freepressblog.org/blog/2007/12/13/blog-hosting/#comment-16822</guid>
		<description>I should clarify that I'm referring to TLA the company, specifically, as well as any other company that follows their same business model, based on allowing advertisers to buy PageRank.

Here's some posts I've made in the past about why I stopped using TLA:

1. &lt;a href="http://freepressblog.org/blog/2007/07/23/goodbye-text-link-ads/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Goodbye Text Link Ads&lt;/a&gt;
2. &lt;a href="http://freepressblog.org/blog/2007/07/29/more-tla-trouble/" rel="nofollow"&gt;More TLA trouble&lt;/a&gt;
3. &lt;a href="http://freepressblog.org/blog/2007/08/16/tla-beginning-of-the-end/" rel="nofollow"&gt;TLA - beginning of the end&lt;/a&gt;

In summary, I don't think it's an ethical advertising model, although that issue is debatable and depends on one's point of view. Secondarily, though, whether it's ethical or not, Google is now actively penalizing sites that use this type of advertising, so that's reason enough not to use it, if nothing else.

The terminology is a bit confusing, because there are also legitimate "text link" ads, which contain the "nofollow" attribute and therefore are not designed to sell PageRank. Google itself sells ads this way, and I have no problem with those.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should clarify that I&#8217;m referring to TLA the company, specifically, as well as any other company that follows their same business model, based on allowing advertisers to buy PageRank.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s some posts I&#8217;ve made in the past about why I stopped using TLA:</p>
<p>1. <a href="http://freepressblog.org/blog/2007/07/23/goodbye-text-link-ads/" rel="nofollow">Goodbye Text Link Ads</a><br />
2. <a href="http://freepressblog.org/blog/2007/07/29/more-tla-trouble/" rel="nofollow">More TLA trouble</a><br />
3. <a href="http://freepressblog.org/blog/2007/08/16/tla-beginning-of-the-end/" rel="nofollow">TLA - beginning of the end</a></p>
<p>In summary, I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s an ethical advertising model, although that issue is debatable and depends on one&#8217;s point of view. Secondarily, though, whether it&#8217;s ethical or not, Google is now actively penalizing sites that use this type of advertising, so that&#8217;s reason enough not to use it, if nothing else.</p>
<p>The terminology is a bit confusing, because there are also legitimate &#8220;text link&#8221; ads, which contain the &#8220;nofollow&#8221; attribute and therefore are not designed to sell PageRank. Google itself sells ads this way, and I have no problem with those.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JasonB</title>
		<link>http://freepressblog.org/blog/2007/12/13/blog-hosting/#comment-16820</link>
		<dc:creator>JasonB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 04:23:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freepressblog.org/blog/2007/12/13/blog-hosting/#comment-16820</guid>
		<description>So why no TLA advertising?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So why no TLA advertising?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
