<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dark Knight Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://freepressblog.org/blog/2008/07/23/dark-knight-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://freepressblog.org/blog/2008/07/23/dark-knight-review/</link>
	<description>A collection of my thoughts and other random stuff I found interesting.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 14:14:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: nstryker</title>
		<link>http://freepressblog.org/blog/2008/07/23/dark-knight-review/#comment-20785</link>
		<dc:creator>nstryker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 06:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freepressblog.org/?p=100432#comment-20785</guid>
		<description>i'm still interested in imaxin' it, assuming lisa doesn't want/need to see it in imax.  it would have to be after august 3rd though, since we're outta here in just a few short days.

re: the double rescue.  i was under the impression that no one knew which address belonged to which person.  either way, it's not like they choose to save one and not the other...batman went after one and all of gothem pd went after the other.

re: batgirl.  i didn't notice that they were hiding her face until you pointed it out just now.  i think it's funny that nerds would care about her being adopted since most character's backstories have been altered at least a little.  like two face having darth vader's origin, haha.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;m still interested in imaxin&#8217; it, assuming lisa doesn&#8217;t want/need to see it in imax.  it would have to be after august 3rd though, since we&#8217;re outta here in just a few short days.</p>
<p>re: the double rescue.  i was under the impression that no one knew which address belonged to which person.  either way, it&#8217;s not like they choose to save one and not the other&#8230;batman went after one and all of gothem pd went after the other.</p>
<p>re: batgirl.  i didn&#8217;t notice that they were hiding her face until you pointed it out just now.  i think it&#8217;s funny that nerds would care about her being adopted since most character&#8217;s backstories have been altered at least a little.  like two face having darth vader&#8217;s origin, haha.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JB</title>
		<link>http://freepressblog.org/blog/2008/07/23/dark-knight-review/#comment-20783</link>
		<dc:creator>JB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 05:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freepressblog.org/?p=100432#comment-20783</guid>
		<description>I would say that there's plenty of me to go around, but actually I'm probably not going to shell out the cash to see this one three times, so I think I'll stick with Martha on this one. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would say that there&#8217;s plenty of me to go around, but actually I&#8217;m probably not going to shell out the cash to see this one three times, so I think I&#8217;ll stick with Martha on this one. <img src='http://freepressblog.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martha</title>
		<link>http://freepressblog.org/blog/2008/07/23/dark-knight-review/#comment-20782</link>
		<dc:creator>Martha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 05:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freepressblog.org/?p=100432#comment-20782</guid>
		<description>Sorry Dan, Jared has a date already. Back off my man!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry Dan, Jared has a date already. Back off my man!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JB</title>
		<link>http://freepressblog.org/blog/2008/07/23/dark-knight-review/#comment-20780</link>
		<dc:creator>JB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 05:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freepressblog.org/?p=100432#comment-20780</guid>
		<description>Oh yeah, that's cool. I didn't know if you had already checked that one. The times are a bit early, so they would seem to indicate that it is in fact showing in IMAX, which that page didn't make clear.

I do still wonder about it, though; might be worth a phone call to verify that this is actually the IMAX version, and not just a normal showing put onto a big screen.

The reason I question it is that they list other movies which aren't IMAX and don't really highlight the distinction between them.

Just going by the Google listings, the one I saw was specifically listed as &lt;a href="http://www.google.com/movies?near=10025&#38;tid=9c6a68ba76231420" rel="nofollow"&gt;"The Dark Night - The IMAX Experience"&lt;/a&gt; alongside other non-IMAX showings of the movie at the same theater listed separately.

In contrast, &lt;a href="http://www.google.com/movies?hl=en&#38;near=91355&#38;tid=c4110acf77cfbe0f" rel="nofollow"&gt;the one in Valencia&lt;/a&gt; doesn't specifically say "IMAX", so it may or may not be. Hopefully it is.

Even if it's not officially the IMAX version, the bigger screen would still be cool. I remember seeing the original Matrix in '99 at an IMAX theater in San Antonio, and it definitely enhanced the viewing experience.

This Dark Knight thing is unique, though (if I understand correctly), in that it's the first mainstream movie that has actually used IMAX equipment during shooting and released a version specifically for viewing in that environment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yeah, that&#8217;s cool. I didn&#8217;t know if you had already checked that one. The times are a bit early, so they would seem to indicate that it is in fact showing in IMAX, which that page didn&#8217;t make clear.</p>
<p>I do still wonder about it, though; might be worth a phone call to verify that this is actually the IMAX version, and not just a normal showing put onto a big screen.</p>
<p>The reason I question it is that they list other movies which aren&#8217;t IMAX and don&#8217;t really highlight the distinction between them.</p>
<p>Just going by the Google listings, the one I saw was specifically listed as <a href="http://www.google.com/movies?near=10025&amp;tid=9c6a68ba76231420" rel="nofollow">&#8220;The Dark Night - The IMAX Experience&#8221;</a> alongside other non-IMAX showings of the movie at the same theater listed separately.</p>
<p>In contrast, <a href="http://www.google.com/movies?hl=en&amp;near=91355&amp;tid=c4110acf77cfbe0f" rel="nofollow">the one in Valencia</a> doesn&#8217;t specifically say &#8220;IMAX&#8221;, so it may or may not be. Hopefully it is.</p>
<p>Even if it&#8217;s not officially the IMAX version, the bigger screen would still be cool. I remember seeing the original Matrix in &#8216;99 at an IMAX theater in San Antonio, and it definitely enhanced the viewing experience.</p>
<p>This Dark Knight thing is unique, though (if I understand correctly), in that it&#8217;s the first mainstream movie that has actually used IMAX equipment during shooting and released a version specifically for viewing in that environment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Cameron</title>
		<link>http://freepressblog.org/blog/2008/07/23/dark-knight-review/#comment-20779</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Cameron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 04:48:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freepressblog.org/?p=100432#comment-20779</guid>
		<description>It's playing near Nate, that's why I mentioned it.

not sure if there is a closer theater with IMAX, not sure if the theater in Simi has IMAX yet.

http://losangeles.citysearch.com/profile/11275749/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s playing near Nate, that&#8217;s why I mentioned it.</p>
<p>not sure if there is a closer theater with IMAX, not sure if the theater in Simi has IMAX yet.</p>
<p><a href="http://losangeles.citysearch.com/profile/11275749/" rel="nofollow">http://losangeles.citysearch.com/profile/11275749/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JB</title>
		<link>http://freepressblog.org/blog/2008/07/23/dark-knight-review/#comment-20778</link>
		<dc:creator>JB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 04:27:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freepressblog.org/?p=100432#comment-20778</guid>
		<description>Yeah, that's what I was thinking, but the prevailing opinion seems to be that he was going for Rachel but got it wrong. I like my / our interpretation a lot better.

I'm planning on seeing it again this weekend with Martha. Is it showing nearby in IMAX?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, that&#8217;s what I was thinking, but the prevailing opinion seems to be that he was going for Rachel but got it wrong. I like my / our interpretation a lot better.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m planning on seeing it again this weekend with Martha. Is it showing nearby in IMAX?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Cameron</title>
		<link>http://freepressblog.org/blog/2008/07/23/dark-knight-review/#comment-20776</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Cameron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 03:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freepressblog.org/?p=100432#comment-20776</guid>
		<description>I'm up for seeing it again - in IMAX of course. Maybe Nate will want to see it in Santa Clarita.


--spoiler response-- I didn't get the impression that Joker switched the addresses, it seemed to me it was the obvious choice for him (if he thinks Dent could save the city without Batman).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m up for seeing it again - in IMAX of course. Maybe Nate will want to see it in Santa Clarita.</p>
<p>&#8211;spoiler response&#8211; I didn&#8217;t get the impression that Joker switched the addresses, it seemed to me it was the obvious choice for him (if he thinks Dent could save the city without Batman).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
