Tag Archives: DRM

DRMTV - Speak now…

Broadcast flag… or forever hold your peace and don’t bother complaining later.

In case you missed it, something very important happened last week, when some DVR users were prevented from recording a particular NBC television program.

By all accounts of the parties involved, it may have been a “mistake” on the part of MS and/or NBC. Leaving that discussion aside (since it’s speculation and not the point anyway) , it’s critical to realize that a test of public opinion has been conducted. Whether this test was initiated intentionally or accidentally doesn’t matter nearly as much as the results of the test, and so far they’re not encouraging.

In case you’re wondering, the essence of the test is determining how the public will react to these sorts of restrictions. Ever since the Sony vs. Universal case of 1984 established the consumer’s right to time-shift their media-consuming experience, the content producers have been looking for ways to undermine that right. (See DIVX - for those of you not old enough to remember this, it would have changed the concept of DVDs as we know them)

With the advent of digital distribution, they sought to reassert this same old claim, this time using technological means, since it had already been denied them via legal channels. Fortunately, three years ago consumers successfully rallied to defeat the broadcast flag mandate, a collusion between the FCC and the studios to take back this right from the consumer again.

With that decision, it was established that while content producers could pass a flag indicating that they don’t wish particular content to be recorded, software and device manufacturers (and consumers) are under no obligation to honor that wish, since it would violate their previously established right.

As of last week, two things are clear: some manufacturers have decided to willingly honor it, and some content providers have decided to attempt to make use of it. The test is how we as consumers will respond to those two actions. Will we make it clear that such actions are not acceptable and force them to reconsider disrespecting that right, or will we not bother since it doesn’t really affect most of us right now?

The sad answer is probably the latter. After all, tons of people have already gotten used to the idea of “buying” crippled and restricted media (music and video) from stores like iTunes, essentially endorsing the same kind of perpetual producer-ownership mentality that is behind the broadcast flag, by voting in the way that’s most meaningful to the companies involved - their dollars.

A bad idea by any other name…

Latest Idea To Fix DRM: Give It A New Name - from Techdirt

Since repeating the claim that DRM enables things for consumers isn’t making it true, an HBO has a new idea: scrap the term DRM in favor of DCE. DCE, of course, standing for Digital Consumer Enablement.

He says he doesn’t want to use the term DRM any longer, not since consumers have come to understand that all it does it limit how they can playback and enjoy legally purchased media, but because it doesn’t apparently express clearly just how wonderful the technology is.

For instance, he says HBO is ready to roll out HD movies on demand, but “can’t”, because people might somehow copy them through the analog hole of component connections, which HBO or cable operators aren’t allowed to disable. That’s his example of DRM “enabling” a new service, and it’s as weak as usual.

A lack of suitable, wonderful, lovely DRM isn’t holding up this service, but rather HBO’s blind and dumb insistence on it, even though impracticality does a better job than technology of stopping HD movie piracy, and of, course, DRM doesn’t stop piracy anyway.

Bob, say it ain’t so

I knew that this was coming, but I never figured Bob Dylan would be a part of it.

Of course, I doubt Bob himself even knows much about it. It’s much more likely due to his record label (Columbia), which is owned by Sony.

After all, anyone remotely interested in tech news recently knows the lengths Sony is willing to go to enforce copy protection schemes, and now it sounds like they’ve found a willing partner in Apple, who will go above and beyond copy protection, helping to provide lock-in support, like we’ve talked about before.

iTunes DRM jacks up wedding

Yes, that’s right (well, kind of). I was at a wedding tonight where the ceremony had started; everyone had walked down the isle except for the bride. The “other people walk down” music faded out and everyone stood to wait for the bride to come down, and…

… waited some more - in silence. After a while, everyone was feeling a bit awkward, especially the bride standing there waiting to walk down, and the guy running the music was scrambling away at his computer. Eventually another song came on (although you could tell it wasn’t the one they originally planned on) and things proceeded from there.

Later I found out what had happened. They wanted a particular song for the bridal entry, so someone went on iTunes and bought it. They probably tested it out during rehearsal and everything was fine. The problem came when they got to that day and all the songs were packaged up (probably via a USB stick or something) and handed off to be played on the computer that the DJ rig was hooked up to. Of course, when it got to that song, up comes the password prompt for the original downloader’s account, which the guy apparently did not have. Doh!

PS - Before Dan gets too excited - yes, I know that this isn’t Apple specific just because it was iTunes, and yes, I know there are many workarounds for this, and they should have burned a CD instead of actually playing songs directly off a computer in the first place for an event like this, but the main point is about how over-zealous DRM can really have crappy results. This guy paid his money to iTunes, and he’s probably only ever going to play that file one or two times in his whole life, but they still have to make darn sure that he doesn’t play it on more than one computer.

Required Reading

The Pig and the Box - by MCM

One day, Pig finds a magic box that can replicate anything you put into it. Pig becomes so protective of his box, and so suspicious of anyone that wants to use it, that he takes drastic measures. He forces everyone to take their copied items home in special buckets… buckets designed to protect.