Tag Archives: social networking

identi.ca

Yes, I obviously have yet to learn this lesson, so I went ahead and signed up for another social media service. Here I am on identi.ca

In case you haven’t heard of identi.ca, the short summary is that it’s Twitter done right.

Everything Twitter currently does is provided by identi.ca, plus some. These additions are particularly interesting to me, since they primarily revolve around openness.

  1. You get OpenID support for starters, which you can associate with and use to log in to multiple accounts (if for some reason you’d want more than one).
  2. Free - as in no, reallyfree - The software itself is truly free software; the main identi.ca server that most people will sign up on and use runs an unmodified copy of the source that’s available for everyone to download and use on their own servers. Leaving no stone unturned, even the data published to their servers is licensed under Creative Commons.
  3. Federation - Here’s the kicker, the one that sent me over the edge. If you do choose to take advantage of the freedom listed above and set up your own server, your server can participate in the larger network, extending it rather than becoming yet another alternative or competitor (unless you want to do that).
    You can even start out on their servers and move your account to your own server(s) later, and keep on participating in the network you have helped to build. I don’t think I’m overstating things when I say that this aspect is revolutionary in the new world of social media.

At this point the only advantage Twitter has in its favor is its user base. Now, considering the nature of these services and the value they provide, this is admittedly a huge advantage.

However, it is my hope is that in time the benefits inherent in the identi.ca approach and the game-changing opportunities for innovation without fragmentation that it provides will win over users (and / or bridge to and from Twitter itself) in the end.

Here we go again

Comparing Pownce to Twitter

Sparked by the recent TechCrunch post about the downward spiral of Pownce, (which itself was inspired by this Uncov piece), I thought I’d throw in my two cents on the issue.

I’ll start right off by saying that I don’t necessarily think a comparison to Twitter is completely valid, but then again, that’s probably part of Pownce’s problem. I don’t use Twitter, but it’s widely regarded as being an excellent tool for what it does, and a large piece of that value is its strict adherence to a model of simplicity.

If their intention was to compete with Twitter (which it seems to have been), they had a hard task ahead of them. They could either do the same thing (very limited functionality, done well) and just do it better (which they probably figured they couldn’t win at, and were probably correct) or go the route of adding more features on top and hoping to woo people over that way.

The problem with the latter approach is that they turned it into essentially a blogging tool with social networking features. I’m sure someone probably thought this was genius, but they missed the fact that people who want to blog already have excellent tools available to them, and most people currently have their fill of social networking on FaceBook.

In looking at Pownce (before I started using it), I used to think that it might be a good fit for someone who essentially wants to “blog” (posts + comments) but maybe wants an ultra-simple entry point. That part totally falls down, however, when it comes to following conversations, which is a key feature of blogs in my opinion.

Pownce does this very poorly: there is no good way to keep up with comment threads that you’ve either participated in or are interested in. I’ve talked plenty about how much I don’t like this aspect of Pownce before, both here and on Pownce itself, so no need to belabor that point.